The use of the hypersonic Oreshnik missile by the Kremlin in the recent attack on Ukraine is believed to be part of a strategic play between Putin and Trump. Moscow justified the attack as retaliation for an alleged strike on Putin’s residence by Ukraine, a claim denied by both Washington and Kyiv.
This incident has exacerbated the existing tensions between the Trump administration and Moscow, highlighted by the US military intercepting the Russian oil tanker Marinera. The Russian Ministry of Defence stated that the attack was in response to what they deemed a terrorist act by the Kyiv regime on Putin’s residence.
While the use of the Oreshnik missile and other weapons in the assault resulted in casualties, it is speculated that the missile may not have been fully armed. The emphasis on the hypersonic missile by Moscow in this attack suggests a symbolic gesture, possibly aimed at widening the divide between the US and NATO.
Putin’s strategic move may be an attempt to create further rifts within the NATO alliance, particularly by highlighting the importance of hypersonic missiles in defense strategies. The US’s interest in Greenland as a strategic location for early detection of such missiles underscores the significance of advanced warning systems in modern warfare.
The attack on Ukraine, which caused disruptions and fear among civilians, also served as a subtle message to Trump regarding the perceived necessity of acquiring Greenland. This situation has intensified tensions within NATO and emphasizes the ongoing power dynamics between world leaders.
The use of the Oreshnik missile in this context may indicate a sense of urgency on Putin’s part to sow discord between the US and NATO, with potential repercussions for global security dynamics.